ExecutiveOrdersEO
MemoMemorandumClinton · D

Presidential Memorandum

Import Relief Determination Under Section 406 of the Trade Act of 1974 on Honey From the People's Republic of China

President Clinton declined to impose import relief (tariff-rate quota) on Chinese honey despite a USITC finding of market disruption, citing net economic costs to consumers and minimal benefit to domestic producers. Instead, he directed USTR to develop a honey import monitoring program within 30 days.

Federal Register 59 FR 19627
No PDF available for this document.

Impact dates

  1. USTR to develop monitoring program for Chinese honey imports

Market exposure

Policy exposure mapping — not investment advice. Illustrative public companies are incomplete and not recommendations.

Sectors

Agriculture

Mechanisms

TariffQuota

Role pressure

  • AdverseDomestic producer — Denied tariff-rate quota protection despite USITC finding of market disruption; faces continued competition from Chinese honey imports
  • ProtectiveImporter — Avoided 25-50% tariff-rate quota; maintains access to U.S. market, though subject to new monitoring program
  • ProtectiveDownstream manufacturer — Industrial honey users avoid higher input costs from proposed quota; continues access to low-end Chinese honey
  • ProtectiveTrading-partner exporter — Chinese honey exporters retain U.S. market access without quota barriers

Geographies

USCN

Illustrative public companies

Curated watchlist matches by sector/role — incomplete; not a recommendation.

ADMArcher Daniels MidlandBGBungeCATCaterpillarCTVACortevaTSNTyson Foods

Confidence: high · Policy alerts

Key directives

  • USTR to develop honey import monitoring program from China within 30 days of determination

Who is ordered

Timeline

Immediate

  • Presidential determination declining import relief
  • Directive to USTR to develop monitoring plan

Near term (90d)

  • USTR monitoring program to be developed (within 30 days)

Long term

  • Continued open trade in honey imports from China
  • Potential ongoing monitoring of honey import flows

Risks & tensions

  • Domestic honey producers lose protection despite proven market disruption
  • Consumer-producer trade-off explicitly favors consumers ($7M cost vs $1.9M benefit)
  • Diversion risk: restrictions would shift imports to other countries, not help U.S. producers
  • Pollination services treated as separable from honey production economics
  • Open trade policy commitment overrides sectoral protection
Presidential Memorandum: Import Relief Determination Under Section 406 of the Trade Act of 1974 on Honey From the People's Republic of China · Executive Orders