Protection of Cultural Property

This executive order delegates presidential authority under the Convention on Cultural Property Implementation Act to three agencies: the U.S. Information Agency, the Department of State, and the Department of the Treasury. It assigns specific functions regarding bilateral agreements, emergency import restrictions, and reporting to Congress for protecting cultural property from illicit trade, and designates the Secretary of the Interior to enforce these provisions in U.S. territories.

51 FR 8475

No PDF available for this document.

Key directives

Delegate presidential functions under sections 303(a)(1), 303(d), 303(e), 303(f), 303(g)(1)(B), 304(b), 304(c)(3), 306(f)(6), 306(g), and 306(h) to USIA Director
Delegate presidential functions under sections 303(a)(2), 303(a)(4), 303(e) [negotiation/conclusion only], 303(g) [except 303(g)(1)(B)], and 304(c)(4) to Secretary of State
Delegate presidential functions under sections 303(d) [suspension of import restrictions] and 304 [application/extension of import restrictions] to Secretary of the Treasury
Designate Secretary of the Interior to carry out enforcement functions in section 314 in territories and other areas

Who is ordered

Timeline

Immediate

Delegation of presidential functions to USIA Director, Secretary of State, and Secretary of the Treasury takes effect

Near term (90d)

Agencies begin exercising delegated authorities for agreement negotiations and import restrictions

Long term

Ongoing implementation of bilateral/multilateral cultural property agreements
Periodic extensions of emergency import restrictions
Congressional reporting on Convention implementation

Risks & tensions

Inter-agency coordination required: multiple provisions specify consultation requirements between USIA, State, and Treasury, creating potential for bureaucratic friction
USIA no longer exists as independent agency (absorbed into State Department in 1999), raising questions about current operational status of these delegations
No explicit deadlines or review mechanisms in EO text; implementation dependent on agency initiative and external requests from State Parties
Vague scope of 'territories and other areas' in Section 4 could create enforcement gaps